Defamation removal, bounded in writing.

A court’s conclusion, not our label.

In the United States, defamation requires a statement of fact that can be checked and shown to be false. Opinion is protected — though calling something an opinion does not make it one, and a verifiable factual claim wrapped inside an opinion can still count. Public figures carry a heavier burden than private individuals. Which side of those lines a post falls on is decided by a court, with a lawyer, and not by us or by the site hosting it.

This also explains something that frustrates almost everyone who tries the obvious route first: platforms are not legally required to take user posts down, and their automated review has no way to judge whether a claim is false. Reporting a post as defamatory usually goes nowhere for exactly that reason. The request has to be aimed somewhere it can land.

Routed to a hook that can be enforced.

Every platform publishes rules it does enforce: harassment, exposed personal information, impersonation, conflicted or fake reviews, off-topic content, and the acceptable-use terms of whoever hosts the site. A post that reads as defamatory to you often breaks one of those rules on its face. That is the request we build, because it is the one that can be acted on without anyone having to rule on your dispute.

Where no hook exists, we say so before taking the item, rather than selling a process with nowhere to go. Timing varies by platform, host, and whether the post has spread to mirrors or search. Aggregate outcomes across eligible cases; individual results vary per your written service agreement.

A removal agency, not a law firm.

The line matters more here than on any other kind of removal, so it is written out rather than implied. Legal work belongs with a lawyer; if your matter needs one, we will tell you instead of selling around it.

Source removal — or search fallback.

The strongest outcome is removal at the source: the post itself comes down from the site that published it. Where a site will not act, search de-listing stops the page from surfacing in results for your name — while the page itself still exists and is still reachable by direct link. That is a real difference, so we never let one be sold as the other. Which of the two your case realistically supports is stated before you pay.

One post, one written price.

One post, forum thread, or article is $2,750. Every order gets a 48-hour acceptance review first — if it is outside the boundary or something we cannot accept, you are refunded before any work begins. Reviewed items carry a written outcome and refund term, so what counts as done is agreed before the work rather than argued after it. Aggregate outcomes across eligible cases; individual results vary per your written service agreement.

Established news reporting and official court records sit outside this flat price and are declined at review, with a referral rather than an invoice.