ITEM
Question
What exactly needs review?
Client-only packet
Locator, account or result context, screenshot note, or a short description.
Public-safe answer
One safe item line with its own written boundary.
02SECTION 02 — EXHIBITS A–F
PUBLIC PROOF, SEALED RECORD
Proof without public exposure.
Six exhibits, A through F: non-consensual imagery and deepfakes, defamatory articles, poisoned search results, executive attacks, live crises, and AI answers that repeat the lie. The public room shows what is safe to preserve, what should never be uploaded, and when an AboutUs client record should open. Case-specific handling and proof detail stay inside the client record.
If you’re reading this in the worst week of your life: Exhibit A is yours — start there.
Before Exhibit A through F
Evidence first. Exposure never.
The best removal file is not the loudest one. It is the one with enough proof to classify, the written boundary attached, and no extra exposure created while asking for help.
CAPTURE
Private summary before files.
A minimal private summary is enough to start. For intimate-image cases, describe what happened instead of sending the sensitive file.
SEAL
Sensitive material stays out of the public path.
The case record uses redacted identifiers and bounded notes so the request can be reviewed without exposing more than the record requires.
BOUNDARY
Every item gets a written boundary.
The public view stops at safe labels: official support, reviewed boundary, referral, or no AboutUs offer. The case-specific answer stays in the client record.
VERIFY
Outcome language stays honest.
Resolved, fallback, referral, and stopped items are not blended into one promise. The receipt says what happened without publishing how the file moved.
Sealed record boundary
Client custody stays sealed.
The public room shows what is safe to preserve and when a client record should open. The private proof read is released only inside an accepted AboutUs client record.
SEALED
Private answer
What appears reviewable, what needs another owner, and what gets declined stay inside the client record.
SEALED
Record notes
Client-specific boundary detail and case context are built for the client record, not published on the public page.
SEALED
Proof detail
Receipts, screenshots, and match notes are reduced to the minimum public language needed for safe review.
SEALED
Continuity record
Reappearance notes and next-step records stay tied to the client record so the public page does not become a guide.
02C - SUBMISSION PACKET
Before anything leaves the file
The packet protects the answer.
Every exhibit has to become a client-only packet before AboutUs can answer cleanly: what the item is, what boundary applies, what can be written, and what proof can safely remain.
Gate
Question
Client-only packet
Public-safe answer
AUTHORITY
Question
What boundary applies?
Client-only packet
Official option, policy category, rights boundary, referral, or no AboutUs offer.
Public-safe answer
A boundary label before AboutUs work, not a blended promise.
REVIEW
Question
What enters the sealed packet?
Client-only packet
Redacted proof, written boundary, requested outcome, and receipt.
Public-safe answer
A client-checkable record without publishing the sealed record.
VERIFY
Question
What proof can be shared?
Client-only packet
Public response, outcome label, receipt, or closed/referral note.
Public-safe answer
A client receipt with public-safe wording.
No intimate file in public intake.
No minor-involved content in commercial work.
No fallback label reused as deletion.
No public step list or client-only record notes.
NCII & Deepfake Removal
48-HR FEDERAL WINDOWThere are real options to take back control. Non-consensual intimate images and AI-generated deepfakes have a federal 48-hour notice-and-removal path for valid requests. We classify the boundary, preserve a safe evidence record, and keep sensitive material out of public intake.
If you found this page in the worst week of your life — this is fixable. Start here.
WHO THIS COVERS
Leaked or stolen intimate images
Hacked accounts, cloud breaches, lost devices — how it got out doesn’t change your rights.
Content shared by an ex or acquaintance
Consent to take a photo was never consent to publish it.
AI deepfakes of your face or body
It doesn’t matter that it isn’t “really” you. Federal law treats an AI-generated intimate image of your likeness the same as a real one.
Recordings made without consent
Hidden cameras, calls, and streams captured without your knowledge.
Sextortion material used to threaten you
Threatening to publish is a federal crime under the same Act — and once material appears, a valid request starts the 48-hour removal clock for covered platforms.
Boundary: adults (18 and over) only. Anything involving a minor is never handled as a commercial removal — see the bordered notice below.
PUBLIC BOUNDARY
Statutory basis — for valid requests where the TAKE IT DOWN Act applies, the law sets a 48-hour removal clock for covered platforms receiving reported non-consensual intimate imagery, real or AI-generated.
Rights basis — when authorship, stolen galleries, reposts, or copied assets matter, the client record can hold the private basis without exposing the material publicly.
Policy boundary — platform and jurisdiction detail stays inside the client record, with only the safe public boundary shown here.
SAFE STARTING POINT
- A minimal private summary of where the content appears — or what happened, if you can’t bring yourself to look
- Roughly when it surfaced, if you know
- Whether anyone is threatening or demanding anything — sextortion changes the safety path
- Nothing else. The private content stays out of public review
WHAT WE’LL TELL YOU HONESTLY
In the client-record check we tell you what appears reviewable, what has to be labeled as fallback, and what we cannot accept. Fallback work is never sold as deletion, and we put that boundary in writing.
Private clusterresolved labelNCII / Deepfake
Leaked intimate images and AI deepfakes appeared across a grouped locator set. The public story is simple: safe evidence custody, public-safe outcome labels, and reappearance review tied to the client record.
Minimal private summary only. The sensitive file itself stays out of forms; a person helps set the boundary safely.
Defamatory Content & Article Removal
The post is false. It does not get blended into a vague reputation package. Defamatory articles, forum threads, fake reviews, and copied pages are reviewed as evidence, with limits and fallback work labeled separately.
WHAT WE REMOVE
Defamatory articles and blog posts
Fake or malicious reviews
Forum and Reddit threads
“Complaint” and shaming sites
Scraper and syndication copies
One defamatory article doesn’t stay one article — related copies are named inside the client record before AboutUs accepts work.
Outdated coverage that misrepresents who you are today
PUBLIC BOUNDARY
Primary-record basis — the strongest file is anchored to the item that actually needs to change; what gets pursued, and in what order, stays inside the client record.
Client-record boundary — private correspondence and next-step context stay inside the accepted client record rather than becoming a public handout.
Legal-referral basis — if court process or attorney coordination is the honest path, we say so before treating fallback work as progress.
SAFE STARTING POINT
- The URL of the original article or post
- Any copies you’ve already noticed — related copies are grouped inside the client record
- One line on what, specifically, is false
- Anything that documents the truth, if you have it (helpful, not required)
PUBLIC ANSWER, SEALED REVIEW
A false statement of fact is stronger than opinion or true-but-harmful coverage. The public page does not sort your facts in detail; the client record gives you a written boundary before authorization.
Mirror networkboundary setDefamation
A defamatory article was copied into a wider cluster. The client record separated the original item, related-copy context, and fallback limits instead of blending them into one promise.
Start boundary review
We’ll tell you which bucket you’re in — before authorization.
Search Result Delisting & Suppression
LABELED FALLBACKWhen a stronger result is not available, limited public-facing work is labeled plainly as a fallback, never sold as a substitute.
WHEN THIS MAY BELONG
Content that survives primary-review attempts
Rare — and when it happens, we say so instead of inventing progress.
Official records and filings that can’t be deleted
Truthful reporting that can’t be removed but shouldn’t define you
Stale results that outlive the original page
Cached and lingering listings that keep surfacing after the page itself is already gone.
LABELED FALLBACK
Search-engine review — formal removal and outdated-content options are considered when the original page cannot be changed, with the limit labeled plainly.
Presence repair — true, current, authoritative results can be built around what cannot come down. Slower than removal, honest about it, and never sold as deletion.
SAFE STARTING POINT
- The search query that surfaces the result
- URLs of the results that hurt
- What’s been tried already, if anything
WHY WE CALL IT A FALLBACK
Delisting removes a result from search; the page itself may still exist for anyone holding the link. When delisting is what you’re getting, your written service agreement says so in those words. If a vendor leads with suppression, ask them why.
Start boundary review
We’ll tell you whether removal or delisting is what your case actually needs.
Executive & Corporate Reputation
Investors, boards, journalists — and now AI assistants — summarize you before you ever get a meeting. We make sure what they find is true, and remove what’s there to do damage.
THE MODERN THREAT MODEL
Coordinated attack pages
Timed to raises, exits, and appointments — built to surface exactly when diligence runs.
Leak amplification
Data-exposure fallout spreading before counsel has the facts.
Impersonation and fake profiles
Accounts speaking in your name to your investors and your staff.
AI-answer poisoning
If an assistant has ingested an attack page, the smear becomes the summary.
CLIENT-RECORD BOUNDARY
Crisis record — something broke tonight. Priority assessment and evidence custody start only after the case boundary is accepted.
Pre-event record — before the raise, the IPO, the board seat: a client-record review of what diligence will see and what should be corrected.
Standing record — recurring review across agreed public surfaces. Problems are sorted inside the client record before they become your next crisis.
SAFE STARTING POINT
- A confidential briefing call — one point of contact, principal or delegate
- The event horizon: raise, exit, appointment, filing date
- Counsel or comms we should coordinate with, if any
DISCRETION AS ARCHITECTURE
Strict confidentiality agreement, a single point of contact, and no public filing unless you choose that path. This page shows no names because the work belongs in the client record.
Request a confidential briefing
Same intake, senior eyes. Under a confidentiality agreement from the first call.
Crisis Response & Continuity
Something broke tonight. Live triage and client-record review keep the next step clear, with a human case team separating what can be handled, what needs another owner, and what should stay outside commercial work.
BUILT FOR
A leak spreading right now
A thread or story gathering speed
A matching copy of an accepted asset
A threat with a deadline attached
THE FIRST HOURS
Priority assessment — share a minimal private summary. If intimate content is involved, sensitive files stay out of the request path.
Hold scattered reports until the record is stable and the boundary is labeled. Timing detail belongs inside the private crisis file.
If it happened tonight, Section 05 — Safety Packet — helps you stabilize without guessing.
SAFE STARTING POINT
- A minimal private summary of what changed — not intimate files
- A channel we can reach you on tonight
- The go-ahead for a private case team to review the record
AFTER THE FIRE IS OUT
Resolved items stay tied to a client-only receipt. If a match reappears, the client record already has the context for the next client-record review.
Private case review is the safest option for threats and intimate-image crises; no public form or checkout.
AI Answer Reputation
Map the public pages AI systems repeat, pursue supportable corrections, and keep answer boundaries inside the client record.
WHAT THIS LOOKS LIKE
An assistant repeating a defamatory claim as fact
AI Overviews framing years-old coverage as current
Chat answers surfacing content you already had removed
Investor and hiring questions about you answered from attack pages
PUBLIC BOUNDARY
Primary-record boundary — AI answers inherit what they read; the underlying public record is the strongest public-facing lever.
Answer-layer boundary — platform review, correction posture, and structured publishing stay bounded inside the client record; which layer moves, and in what order, is a client-record decision.
SAFE STARTING POINT
- The question you asked and the answer you got — paste or screenshot
- Which assistant: ChatGPT, Gemini, AI Overviews, Copilot, other
- The underlying pages, if the answer cites them
HONEST BOUNDARY
No one can force a model to say anything — anyone promising that is selling something else. What can be reviewed is the record the model reads and the correction trail around it. Which stage your case is in stays in the client record.
Start boundary review
Bring the screenshot. We’ll tell you what can be reviewed and what needs to stay client-only.
NOT SURE WHICH EXHIBIT IS YOURS?
Start with a private summary, not files.
For intimate images, deepfakes, or sextortion, open private case review and describe what happened. For non-intimate defamation, doxxing, search, or AI-answer issues, open a client record with a minimal private summary. The sensitive file itself stays out of forms and public checkout.
Open client recordCONFIDENTIAL · LIVE HANDOFF FIRST · ADULTS 18+ ONLY
This page is education, not legal advice. We are a removal agency, not a law firm; for advice on your specific situation, consult an attorney — or start with the written boundary check and we'll tell you honestly what your case needs.
Next in file
03 — StatuteEND OF SECTION 02 — EXHIBITS A–F · SECTION 03 — LEGAL INSTRUMENTS