01
Identify the surface.
Source page, search result, service profile, broker page, or official boundary are treated as separate boundary questions.
DOXXING REMOVAL
Online reputation — removal
Being doxxed? Start with the source.
When someone posts your address, phone, or personal details to harass you, we review the source first and keep Google de-listing as the fallback. Public copy names the boundary; client-record work handles the specific posture.
This page is education, not legal advice. We are a removal agency, not a law firm; for advice on your specific situation, consult an attorney — or start with the written boundary check and we'll tell you honestly what your case needs.
Client-record review
Boundary first, then decide.
Non-intimate reputation matters can start with a private boundary check. Source fit, visibility limits, price, and stop limits are written before work is accepted.
Boundary assessmentWritten boundaryNo guarantees
02
Name the boundary.
Policy, legal boundary, privacy option, official referral, or visibility work is labeled before work begins.
03
Write the boundary.
Eligible work is defined item by item, with stop limits and search-fallback items separated.
04
Verify the outcome.
Removal, de-listing, suppression, and follow-up checks are reported as different outcomes.
Authorization readiness receipt
A quote should read like a boundary file.
Before AboutUs work, the record should name the item, what surface can act, what basis fits, and what is only visibility work.
Locator or surface namedSET
Basis written before authorizationSET
Visibility limits labeledSET
Refund term tied to written boundarySET
ITEM
What is being pursued.
The file separates source pages, search results, broker profiles, mirrors, and excluded records without publishing the work order.
BASIS
Why this basis applies.
Policy, privacy, state record rule, DMCA, or legal referral is named before work begins.
OUTCOME
What success would mean.
Source change, visibility work, follow-up checks, and stop limits stay separate in the written boundary.
TERMS
What happens if it does not fit.
Items AboutUs cannot responsibly accept are declined, referred, or handled under the acceptance review terms.
Assessment decision packet
What gets decided before money changes hands.
The first useful answer is not a sales pitch. It should separate route boundaries, source status, search exposure, excluded items, and anything that belongs with public authorities or outside help.
Official boundary check
Official tools, platform reports, and safety referrals are named before AboutUs work when they fit the situation.
Fit / limit split
Items are sorted into written boundaries before a service agreement: what can be reviewed, what is excluded, and what needs a safer route.
Evidence record
The client record holds the private proof summary so the public page does not become the operating file.
No card-first handoff
Eligible AboutUs work gets written intended outcomes and refund terms. Sensitive matters do not start with upload or checkout.
00 — EXPOSURE MAP
Before intake
Separate the threat from the index.
Doxxing cases fail when everything gets treated as one problem. A clean file separates immediate safety risk, the source page, broker exposure, and the search results amplifying it.
Client-record review is for non-intimate source and search work. If the exposure includes intimate images, sextortion, or a minor-involved situation, use private case review instead.
DANGERBOUNDARY
Immediate physical risk.
If someone is nearby, threatening violence, swatting, stalking, or sending people to your address, treat safety as the first priority. A takedown agency is not emergency response.
Open crisis playbookSOURCEBOUNDARY
A post is exposing you.
A specific forum thread, social post, profile, paste, or harassment page may have a source owner. The client record decides the boundary before work is priced.
Source-first boundaryBROKERBOUNDARY
People-search sites found you.
Broker and directory exposure is usually an ongoing opt-out program, not a one-time doxxing takedown. Separate that before paying.
Broker boundarySEARCHBOUNDARY
Google is amplifying it.
Search de-listing can reduce name-search visibility when source removal is not available yet. It does not delete the page itself.
Search fallbackSignal
Who controls it
Safe handoff
Boundary
D01
Home address, phone, family, workplace, or ID posted to harass
Who controls it
Source platform, host, forum, or publisher
Safe handoff
Keep a private record without spreading the exposed details; the review posture belongs in the client record.
Boundary
If there is immediate danger, use emergency/public-safety channels before agency intake.
D02
Threats, stalking, swatting, or offline escalation
Who controls it
Safety response plus platform evidence trail
Safe handoff
Preserve the threat context privately and prioritize safety channels before any agency work.
Boundary
A takedown request is not a substitute for law enforcement, workplace security, or local safety planning.
D03
People-search or data-broker profile
Who controls it
Broker opt-out process
Safe handoff
Note the broker and where it appears; cross-network handling stays in the client record.
Boundary
Broker cleanup is recurring maintenance; one acute takedown cannot scrub every broker.
D04
Google result exposes the page in your name
Who controls it
Search index plus source page
Safe handoff
Keep the result and source context preserved privately; whether a policy applies is a client-record decision.
Boundary
De-listing hides the result from search; the source page may still be live.
D05
The page mixes doxxing with impersonation or sexual threats
Who controls it
Mixed boundary: platform policy, safety help, and specialized removal
Safe handoff
Separate the exposed personal information from fake accounts, intimate-image threats, or extortion demands.
Boundary
Intimate-image or sextortion elements should move to private case review, not a normal written form.
Use client-record review for a specific non-intimate page, post, or search result. Use the playbook first when the exposed information is creating an immediate safety problem.
Client-record reviewWHAT WE DO
Source first, Google fallback.
A doxx — your home address, phone number, workplace, or family details posted to intimidate you — may fit a harassment, privacy, or safety boundary on the surface that controls it. We keep source review and search de-listing separate in the written record instead of turning this page into a filing guide.Aggregate outcomes across eligible cases; individual results vary per your written service agreement.
WHAT THIS IS — AND ISN’T
Acute takedowns — not broker watch.
We focus on the acute problem: a specific post or page that exposes you to harm. That’s different from the steady drip of data-broker sites that compile public records — those are handled by ongoing opt-out subscriptions, not a one-time takedown. We won’t promise to scrub you from the entire internet. We tell you which problem you actually have, and handle the one we’re built for.
Common questions
Straight answers.
- How do I remove my personal information that was posted online?
- When someone posts your address, phone, or personal details to harass you — a “doxx” — the first question is who controls the source and whether search visibility is only a fallback. Information spread across data-broker sites is a different, ongoing job; we tell you up front which one you’re dealing with before any AboutUs work is authorized.
- Can you remove my home address from Google?
- We review whether the exposed page has a source-removal path and, where eligible, a separate search de-listing boundary. De-listing hides the result from search; removing it at the source is stronger when the host will act.
- Is this the same as a data-broker removal service?
- No. Subscription services continuously opt you out of data brokers. We focus on acute, targeted takedowns — a specific doxxing post or page meant to harass — not ongoing broker watch programs. If brokers are your main exposure, we’ll say so honestly.
- How fast can a doxxing post be taken down?
- It depends on the source owner, the safety posture, and whether the item fits a reviewable boundary. We do not sell a clock before review; eligible work is defined in writing and individual results vary per your written service agreement.
Written boundary
Separate the acute post from the whole internet.
A real doxxing assessment names the source page, the policy or legal boundary, the search fallback if any, and the items that belong with public authorities or a different service.
Client-record review · Written boundary · No blanket guarantees
BOUNDARY
Itemized boundary
URLs, search results, platforms, and search-fallback items are separated before any paid decision.
TERMS
Written outcome
AboutUs work names the intended outcome and refund term. De-listing, suppression, and follow-up are not called source removal.
TRUST
Authorization gate
If the boundary is fuzzy, pause before authorization. The trust page explains the checks that should exist first.
Open authorization gate