01
Identify the surface.
Source page, search result, service profile, broker page, or official boundary are treated as separate boundary questions.
PERSONAL INFORMATION REMOVAL
Privacy — removal
One page. One URL. Bounded in writing.
Your address, phone number, workplace, or identification is sitting on a specific page — a forum post, an uploaded document, a blog entry. That page is what this product removes. If what you actually have is hundreds of data-broker profiles, a subscription sweeper is the right tool and we will tell you so instead of taking the order.
This page is education, not legal advice. We are a removal agency, not a law firm; for advice on your specific situation, consult an attorney — or start with the written boundary check and we'll tell you honestly what your case needs.
Client-record review
Boundary first, then decide.
Non-intimate reputation matters can start with a private boundary check. Source fit, visibility limits, price, and stop limits are written before work is accepted.
Boundary assessmentWritten boundaryNo guarantees
02
Name the boundary.
Policy, legal boundary, privacy option, official referral, or visibility work is labeled before work begins.
03
Write the boundary.
Eligible work is defined item by item, with stop limits and search-fallback items separated.
04
Verify the outcome.
Removal, de-listing, suppression, and follow-up checks are reported as different outcomes.
Authorization readiness receipt
A quote should read like a boundary file.
Before AboutUs work, the record should name the item, what surface can act, what basis fits, and what is only visibility work.
Locator or surface namedSET
Basis written before authorizationSET
Visibility limits labeledSET
Refund term tied to written boundarySET
ITEM
What is being pursued.
The file separates source pages, search results, broker profiles, mirrors, and excluded records without publishing the work order.
BASIS
Why this basis applies.
Policy, privacy, state record rule, DMCA, or legal referral is named before work begins.
OUTCOME
What success would mean.
Source change, visibility work, follow-up checks, and stop limits stay separate in the written boundary.
TERMS
What happens if it does not fit.
Items AboutUs cannot responsibly accept are declined, referred, or handled under the acceptance review terms.
Assessment decision packet
What gets decided before money changes hands.
The first useful answer is not a sales pitch. It should separate route boundaries, source status, search exposure, excluded items, and anything that belongs with public authorities or outside help.
Official boundary check
Official tools, platform reports, and safety referrals are named before AboutUs work when they fit the situation.
Fit / limit split
Items are sorted into written boundaries before a service agreement: what can be reviewed, what is excluded, and what needs a safer route.
Evidence record
The client record holds the private proof summary so the public page does not become the operating file.
No card-first handoff
Eligible AboutUs work gets written intended outcomes and refund terms. Sensitive matters do not start with upload or checkout.
00 — EXPOSURE BASIS RECORD
Before you pay
One page, named before the invoice.
This product removes your details from a specific page. Sorting the exposure by who controls the page, which fields are showing, and whether search work is also needed is what makes the quote honest — and it is also how we find the cases where you should not be buying from us at all.
AboutUs is a removal agency, not a law firm. If the exposure came with threats or stalking, treat it as a safety matter first.
PAGEBASIS
A specific page exposes your details.
A forum post, a blog entry, an uploaded document, a company page, or a leaked file with your address, phone number, workplace, or identification in it.
See the routePOLICYBASIS
The host has a rule about personal data.
Most platforms remove personal contact details and identification on request, independently of any argument about the rest of the content.
Check the groundSEARCHBASIS
Search shows it in your name.
Search engines run their own removal grounds for contact details, identification, and financial data — a separate request from the page itself.
Compare fallbackBROKERBASIS
It is a data-broker profile.
Hundreds of near-identical profiles that regenerate. This is the case where a subscription sweeper is the right tool and we are not.
See what fitsSignal
Public boundary
Client record
Boundary
P01
Your address or phone is in a forum post
Public boundary
Platform personal-information rules, which usually reach contact details on their own terms.
Client record
The URL and which fields are exposed, kept in the client record.
Boundary
The surrounding text can survive even when the details are taken out.
P02
A document with your ID was uploaded somewhere
Public boundary
Identification data has one of the strongest removal grounds on both hosts and search engines.
Client record
Where the file sits and what identifying data it carries.
Boundary
Mirrors and re-uploads are separate items, priced separately.
P03
A company or club page lists your details
Public boundary
The publisher controls it, so a direct request to the owner or webmaster is the first route.
Client record
Who runs the site, and what you are asking to have taken out.
Boundary
Some organisations will refuse, and then search work is the remaining option.
P04
The page is gone but search still shows the details
Public boundary
An index refresh, which is a narrower and different request from removal.
Client record
Confirm the page is genuinely gone before paying for anything more.
Boundary
Refreshing an index is not deletion and is priced as its own item.
P05
It was posted to threaten, stalk, or incite others
Public boundary
Harassment rules, which move faster and carry more weight than a plain data request.
Client record
Handled as a safety matter, and the wider campaign is assessed with it.
Boundary
Start on the doxxing route instead of here, and consider law enforcement first.
P06
Dozens of people-search profiles have your data
Public boundary
Broker opt-outs, which regenerate and need ongoing sweeps rather than one-off removal.
Client record
Nothing to file with us — this is the wrong product for that job.
Boundary
Declined, with an honest pointer to a subscription service instead.
If the boundary is still unclear, use client-record review before paying. A useful quote names the URL, the exposed fields, the intended outcome, fallback status, and the refund term.
Client-record reviewWRONG PRODUCT
When you should not buy this.
If your details are spread across people-search and data-broker sites — the ones that rebuild a profile from public records a few weeks after you opt out — then per-URL removal is the wrong shape of product. You would be paying a flat fee per page against a network that regenerates. Subscription services exist precisely for that, they cost a fraction of this per year, and they are the honest recommendation.
What those services generally cannot do is remove a forum post, a news or blog article, an uploaded document, or a page run by a person rather than a broker — their own help material says as much. That is the gap this product fills, and it is the only case where buying it makes sense.
One more split worth naming: if the exposure came with threats, stalking, or an attempt to set other people on you, that is doxxing and it is handled differently, with safety first.
HOW IT WORKS
The page first, search second.
The page itself comes first, because that is the only outcome that actually takes the data off the internet. Most platforms have rules covering contact details and identification that apply on their own, without anyone having to settle an argument about the rest of the content — which is why an exposure request often succeeds where a dispute about the same page would not.
Search is treated as a second, separate item. Search engines run their own removal grounds for contact details, identification, and financial data, and that request stands even when the page stays up. Timing varies by host and platform. Aggregate outcomes across eligible cases; individual results vary per your written service agreement.
REMOVAL VS DE-LISTING
Source removal — or search fallback.
Removal at the source means the details are gone from the page. Search removal means the page still exists, still holds your details, and is still reachable by direct link — it simply stops surfacing in results. For exposed personal data that difference matters more than usual, because anyone who already has the link still has everything. We label which one your case supports before you pay, and never sell the second as the first.
PRICING
Per URL, in writing.
One URL is $1,250. Every order gets a 48-hour acceptance review first — and that review includes deciding whether a subscription sweeper is genuinely the better fit for you, in which case you are refunded before any work begins. Mirrors and re-uploads are separate items. Reviewed items carry a written outcome and refund term. Aggregate outcomes across eligible cases; individual results vary per your written service agreement.
Common questions
Straight answers.
- How do I get my address or phone number off a website?
- It depends on who controls the page. Most platforms have personal-information rules that reach contact details and identification directly, so the request goes to the host on that ground. Where a private site publishes it, the route is the owner or webmaster. And separately from the page itself, search engines run their own removal grounds for contact details, identification, and financial data — which is why the page and the search result are treated as two items rather than one.
- How is this different from DeleteMe or Incogni?
- They solve a different problem, and solve it better than we would. Subscription services sweep data-broker and people-search databases, where your profile is one of hundreds and regenerates after removal — that is a job for ongoing monitoring at a monthly price. We remove your details from one specific page: a forum post, an uploaded document, a blog entry, a company listing. Those services generally cannot do that, and their own help pages say so.
- I have profiles on dozens of people-search sites. Should I buy this?
- No, and we will say so at review rather than take the order. Per-URL removal against a broker network would cost you far more than a subscription and would not stop the profiles regenerating. Use a subscription sweeper for that. Come to us when there is a specific page a sweeper cannot touch.
- Someone posted my details to harass me. Is this the right page?
- Start with our doxxing route instead. When exposure is part of a campaign to threaten, stalk, or set others on you, safety comes before removal, and the request itself is stronger under harassment rules than under a plain data-removal ground. The work overlaps but the handling and the urgency do not.
- How much does it cost?
- One URL is $1,250. Every order gets a 48-hour acceptance review first — if it is outside the boundary, or if a subscription service is genuinely the better fit, you are refunded before any work begins. Reviewed items carry a written outcome and refund term. Aggregate outcomes across eligible cases; individual results vary per your written service agreement.
Written boundary
One page, named before the invoice.
Per-URL removal is for a specific page that exposes your details. If what you actually need is an ongoing sweep of data brokers, a subscription service fits better and we will say so instead of selling you this.
Client-record review · Written boundary · No blanket guarantees
BOUNDARY
Itemized boundary
URLs, search results, platforms, and search-fallback items are separated before any paid decision.
TERMS
Written outcome
AboutUs work names the intended outcome and refund term. De-listing, suppression, and follow-up are not called source removal.
TRUST
Authorization gate
If the boundary is fuzzy, pause before authorization. The trust page explains the checks that should exist first.
Open authorization gate